Back in December I wrote about a star heading our way. It’s nothing to worry about, but it demonstrated that stars can come relatively close to our solar system on long time scales. Now new research finds that one close approach occurred just 70,000 years ago.

The star is known as Scholz’s star, and is a small red dwarf star with a brown dwarf companion. Currently it is about 20 light years from the Sun, but 70,000 years ago it was only 52,000 AU away, or about 0.8 light years. That might not seem particularly close, but the outer edge of the Oort cloud likely extends farther than that, so the star could have gravitationally perturbed Oort cloud objects, sending some toward the inner solar system.

Some of you might look at that 70,000 BC date and wonder if this might have anything to do with the “bottleneck  theory” of human evolution, where the human population supposedly winnowed to about 10,000 individuals. The answer is no for two reasons. The first is that genetic evidence for a 70,000 BC bottleneck is not particularly strong, the second is that any cometary bodies perturbed by the close encounter would take time to reach us. In this case, the trip from the outer Oort cloud to the inner solar system is about 2 million years. So there might be a slight uptick in comets in a couple million years, but the team estimates that this won’t be significant.

The work also puts doubt on the upcoming close encounter of HIP 85605 I wrote about in December. It seems the distance of HIP 85605 was underestimated by a factor of 10, which means it won’t come nearly as close as we thought. If that’s the case, then Scholz’s star marks the closest stellar approach known. The number and distance of these kinds of close encounters are likely to change a bit as we continue to get better data on close faint stars. For example, when the Gaia spacecraft becomes active we’ll have position and motion data of more than a billion stars.

Paper: Eric E. Mamajek et al. The Closest Known Flyby of a Star to the Solar System ApJ 800 L17 (2015)

The post Missed It By That Much appeared first on One Universe at a Time.

Recently there’s been news of the discovery of the closest potentially habitable exoplanet yet.  Named Gliese 832 c, it is a “super-Earth” orbiting in the habitable zone of a red dwarf star.  In April of this year, there was news of the “most Earth-like planet yet”. Named Kepler 186 f, it is a super-Earth orbiting a red dwarf star. In 2012, there was an announcement of the “most habitable exoplanet yet” named Gliese 581 g.  It is a …wait for it… super-Earth orbiting a red dwarf. Whenever a new potentially habitable world is announced, it will likely be a super-Earth orbiting a red dwarf. But why?

It first has to do with the nature of stars.  The majority of stars are red dwarfs.  They make up about 3/4 of all main sequence stars, compared to only 8% that are Sun-like (G-class).  From what we’ve seen, pretty much all stars have planets, so all things being even most planets in the universe orbit red dwarf stars. It is to be expected then that most potentially habitable planets are around red dwarfs.

It also has to do with the nature of planet hunting.  There are two major ways to find a planet around another star.  The first is known as the transit method, where a planet passes in front of its star, causing it to dim slightly.  This dip in brightness is pretty small, which can make it difficult to observe.  But the smaller the star and the larger the planet, the bigger the dip in brightness. So large planets around small stars are easier to find than smaller planets around larger stars. The second method is known as the radial velocity method. This technique measures the Doppler shift of a star as it wobbles toward and away from us. The wobble is due to the gravitational pull of a planet as it orbits the star.  The bigger the planet the greater the pull, and the smaller the star the more it reacts to that pull, so larger planets around smaller stars produce more wobble than smaller planets around larger stars.  So again it is easier to find the former than the latter.

Finally, it has to do with our definition of “potentially habitable”. In this case potentially habitable means the planet has to be within the right distance range for liquid water to be possible. In our own solar system that is about the range from Venus to Mars.  It also requires that the planet must be rocky like Earth. This means a planet can’t be larger than about 2 Earth diameters, or a few Earth masses.  Basically within the Mars to super-Earth range of size.

Of the planets that meet those conditions, super-Earths around red dwarfs are the easiest to find. So that’s why they are so often in the news.  Of course none of this says anything about whether the planets actually have life. One big downside of red dwarfs is that they tend to produce large solar flares and x-rays that would be pretty hostile to life on a closely orbiting planet.  Red dwarfs likely have the most potentially habitable planets, but they might not have the most actually inhabited planets.

We are still in the early days of planet discovery. What you’ll see over time is that new “potentially habitable” planets will be more Earth-like in size, and orbiting more Sun-like stars, until eventually we will find one very similar to our own.

The post The Red Zone appeared first on One Universe at a Time.