Comments on: The Incredible Shrinking Universe https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/ Brian Koberlein Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:26:59 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.3 By: JDog https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-6141 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:00:43 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-6141 it is just a theory just a theory guys may not happen and please really is scary right now

]]>
By: thespecialphysicist https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-5621 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:40:35 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-5621 All that ‘s completely false simply because galaxies in the Local Group can’t get closer quicker than the speed of light (as they have mass/energy) and the space between them (which is indeed expanding faster than light) will make distances among them spread, at a faster pace than its gravitational attraction (whatever it is).

]]>
By: Lowell https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-5276 Wed, 10 May 2017 22:53:56 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-5276 …would we not THEN be able to see part of the universe that otherwise physics claims as “UNobservable”?

]]>
By: Lowell https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-5273 Wed, 10 May 2017 18:07:43 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-5273 …as a further point to my comment above, if the full universe were a billion times larger than the observable universe, and creating particle sized wormholes connect two random locations, then it would be more likely than not (one billion times more likely) that any wormhole you DO create would connect to a part of the universe that is currently deemed “unobservable”.

]]>
By: Lowell https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-5272 Wed, 10 May 2017 18:04:26 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-5272 Brian, given the theoretical support for Einstein-Rosen bridges (aka “wormholes”), doesn’t that essentially expand the “observable universe” to, essentially, all quarters of the universe? For instance, suppose one opens just a particle-sized wormhole between here (our “center”) to a random location elsewhere in the universe, say 500 billion light years away (well past the current “observable” universe). If you then transport a quantum entangled particle to the other side, where its state is influenced by the other side of the universe, are we not able to observe it? Suppose that particle-sized wormhole is large enough for photons to pass through… would we not be able to see part of the universe that otherwise physics claims as “observable”?

]]>
By: mark slater https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-5140 Mon, 03 Apr 2017 10:31:48 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-5140 In short I theorise that space appears to be expanding because the distances between galaxies are increasing, I theorise that this is because all galaxies are shrinking, because of fusion. Each galaxy is finding a ‘stable position’ to be in compared to the positions of other galaxies. It is not space that is expanding, it is being created, the motion of all galaxies is filling the space created. Galaxies are being pulled and pushed by their closest neighbouring galaxies (black hole), uniformly throughout the universe”

]]>
By: Neil Dickson https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-4079 Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:50:17 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-4079 Sorry for the very late reply, but your comment got me thinking, and I thought you might be interested to know that it’s the frequency with which the universe expands by a factor of e (2.71828…). The reciprocal of 2.113e-18 Hz is 4.733e+17 s, so every roughly 15 billion years, it’d expand by a factor of e, if the rate stayed constant.

]]>
By: Val puoa https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-3941 Sat, 07 May 2016 16:48:52 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-3941 Hi. Last time I wrote to you about the shape of the universe. If you climb the shape of the universe of course your going to the find the point where were standing. were moving in that direction thats what causes climate change. For that change people blame NASA and science, its not true. Were climbing in a twisted area. Thanks.

]]>
By: Dr. Jon Overton (@realpj) https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-3926 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 05:34:05 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-3926 Unless of course, the Alcubierre drive turns out to be something that can be successfully built and implemented. Given that drive makes use of a “bubble” of spacetime compressed in front of and expanded behind the ship, in theory it might exceed the speed of light as seen by an observer outside that bubble..

]]>
By: James https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-3925 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 01:42:39 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-3925 “20 km/s per million light years” — One could reduce the units to Hertz, which would give you about 2.113e-18 Hz. Does this have any real-world application, or is my brain just doing useless analysis?

]]>
By: thomas https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-3924 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:23:25 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-3924 Now this makes me sad!

]]>
By: M.Saiful Islam https://briankoberlein.com/2016/04/29/incredible-shrinking-universe/#comment-3923 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:06:12 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=5963#comment-3923 Observations at the moment will never be the same at anytime in the future in space & time in ever expanding cosmos.

]]>