Comments on: Beyond The Universe

By: S A Sattar

Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:00:36 +0000

in my openion,universe has a definite end and beyond this end ,there is nothing,no space , no time

]]>

By: HC

Tue, 09 May 2017 14:00:01 +0000

So… What is there beyond the Universe?

Could there be a totally different dimension not bound to what we, in our limited understanding of space, know as time and space?

I mean, there has to be something… What’s there then? I know we are limited as far as what we understand and we can only come up with limited explanations based on known facts… but again our facts of what’s out there, to the edges, is not a certainty… which opens up the possibility of unlimited theories…

Could our universe be part of a supercluster of universes? Could it be the only universe but after it their is a different dimension with totally different laws of physics etc?…

]]>

By: Brian Koberlein

Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:20:08 +0000

Millenia of scientific knowledge would argue otherwise…

]]>

By: sankarakrishnan

Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:42:33 +0000

The universe is beyond science. This can be realised only through meditation and not physically as we all think.

]]>

By: Physicist Wannabe

Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:36:41 +0000

Has there been calculations of how fast the Universe beyond the CMB is expanding outwards and how fast it is being swallowed by the CMB expanding into it?

Also, wouldn’t the existence of galaxies beyond the CMB be the reason we see galaxies that appear to be formed so soon after the Big Bang. Because these are galaxies that formed beyond the CMB and have since been overtaken by the CMB expanding into it?

]]>

By: ernie johnson I

Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:06:31 +0000

If it take light 1 billion years to reach something during that one billion years space is expanding so the point at wich it originating is father back now so even though it took 1 billion years to get here it would take a lot longer to get back. So that’s how two Galaxy’s can be over 13.8 billion years apart.

]]>

By: Joseph

Wed, 18 May 2016 01:09:38 +0000

Mark, I know what you mean. I have a pretty high I.Q. and i have a hard time understanding their logic. I’m not saying they’re wrong but I wish I could follow their arguments. Maybe the fact that space itself can travel faster than the speed of light. When space itself expands they say it travels faster than the speed of light. Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light when it travels within space but space itself can travel, expand, at a faster rate. Mind blowing

]]>

By: Mark Christian

Sun, 08 May 2016 05:53:42 +0000

I have a problem with dating the universe the way we do is that… we date the universe as the furthest light we can see, like Hubble Ultra Deep Field 13+ billion light years – hence 13+ billion years old equals the universe.

I understand Pi, but if we have spacetime, and if all the fabric of the universe is part of spacetime than how can even in diameter there be more distance than the 13.8
billion years of the age of the universe? The diameter of the universe could be say 400 billion light years across. The diameter is still part of spacetime. So that would mean 2 galaxies could be further apart in light years than the lifetime of the universe? Which can’t be true because the diameter couldn’t have grown faster the the center of the universe if all of it is collectively spacetime? What the heck

]]>

By: Benny Heflinger

Fri, 25 Mar 2016 21:38:06 +0000

Not to be rude by double posting but I just found a shape called the “umbilic torus” which is like a mobius strip and torus at the same time. Maybe the universe is shape like that.

]]>

By: Benny Heflinger

Fri, 25 Mar 2016 20:34:35 +0000

That’s to say the universe is flat, perhaps it’s curving.
Here is a quote I just found on space.com about the shape of the universe.

“The shape of the universe depends on its density. If the density is more than the critical density, the universe is closed and curves like a sphere; if less, it will curve like a saddle. But if the actual density of the universe is equal to the critical density, as scientists think it is, then it will extend forever like a flat piece of paper.”

Credit: NASA/WMAP Science team.

This is why it leads me to believe it’s more like a möbius strip twisting infinitly. If you follow the curving path of a mobius strip it appears your traveling in a straight line along a flat surface forever, when actually your traveling along a curving path indefinitely.

]]>

By: yahim stnsc

Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:08:30 +0000

For anything more distant, there simply wasn’t enough time for the regions to communicate, even at the speed of light

how about the spooky action at a distance and time? quantum stuff is never mentioned in this article though somehow can it be ignored? seems weard. in another article you said the big bang happened everywhere thus if the universe is expanding we can conclude is not only expanding in space but also in time thus maybe this expansion we just observe it as distance and we do not actually measure the time. am i making any sense? it is a space time thus it must expand in both.

how can the universe be flat, expand in the same time and there is no center? seems kind of strange theory. would be like you stretch some paper but all particles will believe they are the center? but big bang theory does not give any center right?

how can the flat universe explain the black holes?

]]>

By: Robert Curry

Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:34:18 +0000

Humans will never be able to discover what exists beyond our universe.

]]>