Comments on: Four in a Row https://briankoberlein.com/2015/05/17/four-in-a-row/ Brian Koberlein Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:22:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1 By: Arturo Gutierrez https://briankoberlein.com/2015/05/17/four-in-a-row/#comment-2367 Tue, 19 May 2015 16:15:59 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=4807#comment-2367 I’m guessing we’ve discarded the quasars being mirror images from a gravitational lens, correct?

]]>
By: richk https://briankoberlein.com/2015/05/17/four-in-a-row/#comment-2364 Sun, 17 May 2015 21:00:12 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=4807#comment-2364 The largest known is estimated to consume matter equivalent to 600 Earths per minute.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar

]]>
By: Brian Koberlein https://briankoberlein.com/2015/05/17/four-in-a-row/#comment-2363 Sun, 17 May 2015 18:54:09 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=4807#comment-2363 It’s large given its density over such a wide scale.

]]>
By: Amir https://briankoberlein.com/2015/05/17/four-in-a-row/#comment-2362 Sun, 17 May 2015 13:18:47 +0000 https://briankoberlein.com/?p=4807#comment-2362 Why is this considered a large nebula? The milky way is 30kpc across and has similar mass… And the early universe was denser than today.

]]>